I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#121

Post by Naperville »

Yes I missed the CTS-XHP, and 80CrV2 as well.
I support the 2nd Amendment Organizations of GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF, and "Knife Rights"
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
User avatar
dj moonbat
Member
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:58 am
Location: Sunny SoCal

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#122

Post by dj moonbat »

This report really makes me appreciate Cru-Wear even more.
User avatar
ThomC
Member
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2019 3:01 pm
Location: France

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#123

Post by ThomC »

As always, a very interesting read. I binged your articles shortly after joining the forum, and it's provided me with a lot of knowledge.
Fascinating to see S30V so high on the list after seeing it turned down as a commonplace steel. Makes me want to give it much more work in PE and SE.
European amateur knife enthusiast
Hikes and outdoors galore
🏍️Motorcycle enthusiast
In the knoife box : M4 Millie, Spyderco Perrin Street Bowie, TOPS Tanimboca
In the future : CE/SE/Rex45/MagnaCut Millie, K2, Slysz Bowie, linerlock Sage
User avatar
ZrowsN1s
Member
Posts: 7368
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:08 pm
Location: San Diego, California USA

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#124

Post by ZrowsN1s »

Truly a massive undertaking. The knife community owes you a thank you and then some. Can't wait to see it as it evolves. I'm particularly interested to see what the chart looks like with the same steels across a different range of heat treats. It's nice to see S30V for example measured across 3 different hardnesses. I realize not all steels are suited for it, but I'd really like to see the performance of steels in the 63-70hr range.
-Matt a.k.a. Lo_Que, loadedquestions135 I ❤ The P'KAL :bug-red

"The world of edges has a small doorway in, but opens into a cavern that is both wide and deep." -sal
"Ghost hunters scope the edge." -sal
User avatar
kennethsime
Member
Posts: 4786
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:28 pm
Location: California

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#125

Post by kennethsime »

kennethsime wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 10:08 am
Larrin, is there any way we could see a sortable version of this table? Or perhaps just an image sorted by TCC rather than Steel name?
Nevermind, I ran the image through an OCR and uploaded as a Google Sheet. Here it is, in case anyone wants to take a look.

Larrin, I hope that's ok. I included the source (your article) and blog name for attribution, and I'm only sharing the link here in the forum. If you'd prefer I either just make it private, or take it down entirely, I'm totally happy to. I just wanted to be able to sort the info quickly.
I'm happiest with Micarta and Tool Steel.

Top four in rotation: K390 + GCM PM2, ZCarta Shaman, Crucarta PM2, K390 + GCM Straight Spine Stretch.
Baron Mind
Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:18 pm

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#126

Post by Baron Mind »

Moment of clarity. Their will definitely be times when a steel that maximizes one particular attribute is desired, i.e maximum corrosion resistance, or maximum toughness. But when we're discussing optimal edc blade steel, or best blade steel, what we should be looking for are those handful of steels that manage to score highly in more than one area, transcending the the traditional concept of equal tradeoffs in steel attributes. So historically if a steel is a 10 in wear resistance it is a 1 on toughness. Or if it is a 5 in wear resistance it is a 5 on toughness. The steels that manage to be a 7 on wear resistance AND a 7 in toughness, rather than a 3, those are the special steels.
User avatar
Naperville
Member
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:58 am
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#127

Post by Naperville »

Baron Mind wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 9:44 pm
Moment of clarity. Their will definitely be times when a steel that maximizes one particular attribute is desired, i.e maximum corrosion resistance, or maximum toughness. But when we're discussing optimal edc blade steel, or best blade steel, what we should be looking for are those handful of steels that manage to score highly in more than one area, transcending the the traditional concept of equal tradeoffs in steel attributes. So historically if a steel is a 10 in wear resistance it is a 1 on toughness. Or if it is a 5 in wear resistance it is a 5 on toughness. The steels that manage to be a 7 on wear resistance AND a 7 in toughness, rather than a 3, those are the special steels.
That is where a combination of knife design; pocket time and use; along with scientific testing comes in to play, . There is no one steel that satisfies all needs.
I support the 2nd Amendment Organizations of GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF, and "Knife Rights"
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
User avatar
blues
Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 11:49 am
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#128

Post by blues »

kennethsime wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 9:23 pm
Nevermind, I ran the image through an OCR and uploaded as a Google Sheet. Here it is, in case anyone wants to take a look.

Larrin, I hope that's ok. I included the source (your article) and blog name for attribution, and I'm only sharing the link here in the forum. If you'd prefer I either just make it private, or take it down entirely, I'm totally happy to. I just wanted to be able to sort the info quickly.
Thanks for doing this, it makes it easier to skim down the performance column and see how the steels compared head to head.
- Retired from the chase -
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#129

Post by Larrin »

Early on in the website I used real tables rather than images to show data. But I had so many formatting issues with the tables I had to switch to images. Thanks for doing the OCR work and sharing it.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
User avatar
Deadboxhero
Member
Posts: 2178
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:35 am
Contact:

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#130

Post by Deadboxhero »

The Meat man wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 9:12 am
Deadboxhero wrote:
Sat May 02, 2020 12:22 pm
Woo, very exciting Sal.

This has been in my pocket for the past month everyday.

My favorite Spyderco so far.

Well done sir.
Lovely edge there Shawn! :cool:
Thanks man, its a pleasure to use. :D
Big Brown Bear
https://www.youtube.com/user/shawnhouston
Triple B Handmade Knives
User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 15210
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#131

Post by Wartstein »

Here is a nice video (link below) covering the article and first and foremost giving Larrin and Shawn the credit they truly deserve for their amazing work

It explains the text and graphs at a rather basic level (not meant negatively at all, for many that certainly ia s good thing!)

https://youtu.be/TDmBQT_G9xY&t=1071s
Top three going by pocket-time (update March 24):
- EDC: Endura thin red line ffg combo edge (VG10); Wayne Goddard PE (4V), Endela SE (VG10)
-Mountains/outdoors: Pac.Salt 1 SE (H1), Salt 2 SE (LC200N), and also Wayne Goddard PE (4V)
Michael Janich
Member
Posts: 3001
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Longmont, CO USA
Contact:

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#132

Post by Michael Janich »

ThomC wrote:
Sun May 03, 2020 12:21 pm
As always, a very interesting read. I binged your articles shortly after joining the forum, and it's provided me with a lot of knowledge.
Fascinating to see S30V so high on the list after seeing it turned down as a commonplace steel. Makes me want to give it much more work in PE and SE.
Great observation. That parallels our experience and testing--and our reasoning to keep it as a well-balanced standard of performance and affordability.

Stay safe,

Mike
qazy
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 6:28 pm

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#133

Post by qazy »

Larrin, great job! Thank you for all the effort and time put into this project.
The reception was indeed great of your work except in Krazy Kutters Forum ;) - where it is a bit rocky.
I hope we can see more steels tested soon and have rope cutting results as well. Good luck in modifying the machine for the rope.
Also kudos to Sal for offering hard to get steels including their proprietary SPY steel. I bet not many manufacturers are willing to spend the time and effort to go that extra mile. I wonder what would Konosuke say if you ask them to ship you some HD billets. :/
GarageBoy
Member
Posts: 2218
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Brooklyn NY

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#134

Post by GarageBoy »

There's just a handful of of members on that forum who are caught up on the idea that "this one knifemaker has the best heat treat, and x steel will out cut y steel in my experience, so your test is invalid"

I'd be excited to see any future results from these tests
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#135

Post by Larrin »

Wartstein wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 3:35 am
Here is a nice video (link below) covering the article and first and foremost giving Larrin and Shawn the credit they truly deserve for their amazing work

It explains the text and graphs at a rather basic level (not meant negatively at all, for many that certainly ia s good thing!)

https://youtu.be/TDmBQT_G9xY&t=1071s
Good video!
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
User avatar
emanuel
Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:51 am
Location: Romania

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#136

Post by emanuel »

I've been following this for awhile on instagram/youtube, both from BBB and Larrin's perspectives. I could read these results on repeat for days, amazing. What's also amazing is how well s30v and s90v performed, and I'm honestly not surprised. In regard to s90v, I'm curios if the better performance compared to its niobium brother is because the s110v steel wasn't at its peak hardness/performance (64-65hrc) compared to what s90v can attain? I'm a bit surprised too by the LC200N's low (relatively) result, but hey no steel has everything, it works great for what it's made for. I wish Spyderco would give us some s60v offerings in the future, if I may shamelessly insert this in here just because I can :D
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#137

Post by Larrin »

emanuel wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 11:21 am
I've been following this for awhile on instagram/youtube, both from BBB and Larrin's perspectives. I could read these results on repeat for days, amazing. What's also amazing is how well s30v and s90v performed, and I'm honestly not surprised. In regard to s90v, I'm curios if the better performance compared to its niobium brother is because the s110v steel wasn't at its peak hardness/performance (64-65hrc) compared to what s90v can attain? I'm a bit surprised too by the LC200N's low (relatively) result, but hey no steel has everything, it works great for what it's made for. I wish Spyderco would give us some s60v offerings in the future, if I may shamelessly insert this in here just because I can :D
S90V and S110v heat treat pretty similarly. Differences in hardness are knifemaker/manufacturer decisions.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Cycletroll
Member
Posts: 799
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 4:12 pm
Location: North Central New Mexico

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#138

Post by Cycletroll »

Larrin & Shawn,
Do you have any hard data on s90v toughness at the 59-61 HRC that Spyderco traditionally treats to? Further, I am curious how s90v and s110v compare in toughness at similar HRC? From what I gather from your data thus far s90v should be slightly tougher?
How does s90v @60HRC compare to m390/204p/20cv? Basically, what is the toughest stainless high carbide steel?
Again, thanks so much for your hard work and the data it generates.
User avatar
emanuel
Member
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:51 am
Location: Romania

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#139

Post by emanuel »

Larrin wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 11:49 am
S90V and S110v heat treat pretty similarly. Differences in hardness are knifemaker/manufacturer decisions.
I always thought s110v can hit 2-3hrc higher than s90v. TIL. Thx! Can't wait for some future tests and refinements you have in plan for these tests. Great data.
User avatar
Larrin
Member
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels

#140

Post by Larrin »

Cycletroll wrote:
Wed May 06, 2020 12:04 pm
Larrin & Shawn,
Do you have any hard data on s90v toughness at the 59-61 HRC that Spyderco traditionally treats to? Further, I am curious how s90v and s110v compare in toughness at similar HRC? From what I gather from your data thus far s90v should be slightly tougher?
How does s90v @60HRC compare to m390/204p/20cv? Basically, what is the toughest stainless high carbide steel?
Again, thanks so much for your hard work and the data it generates.
Hopefully we will be able to answer those questions in the future. My guess is toughness specimens for S90V would come out closer to S110V though because I would probably compare with the same heat treatment.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Post Reply