I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
- Naperville
- Member
- Posts: 4431
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:58 am
- Location: Illinois, USA
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Yes I missed the CTS-XHP, and 80CrV2 as well.
I support the 2nd Amendment Organizations of GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF, and "Knife Rights"
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
- dj moonbat
- Member
- Posts: 1488
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:58 am
- Location: Sunny SoCal
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
This report really makes me appreciate Cru-Wear even more.
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
As always, a very interesting read. I binged your articles shortly after joining the forum, and it's provided me with a lot of knowledge.
Fascinating to see S30V so high on the list after seeing it turned down as a commonplace steel. Makes me want to give it much more work in PE and SE.
Fascinating to see S30V so high on the list after seeing it turned down as a commonplace steel. Makes me want to give it much more work in PE and SE.
European amateur knife enthusiast
Hikes and outdoors galore
Motorcycle enthusiast
In the knoife box : M4 Millie, Spyderco Perrin Street Bowie, TOPS Tanimboca
In the future : CE/SE/Rex45/MagnaCut Millie, K2, Slysz Bowie, linerlock Sage
Hikes and outdoors galore
Motorcycle enthusiast
In the knoife box : M4 Millie, Spyderco Perrin Street Bowie, TOPS Tanimboca
In the future : CE/SE/Rex45/MagnaCut Millie, K2, Slysz Bowie, linerlock Sage
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Truly a massive undertaking. The knife community owes you a thank you and then some. Can't wait to see it as it evolves. I'm particularly interested to see what the chart looks like with the same steels across a different range of heat treats. It's nice to see S30V for example measured across 3 different hardnesses. I realize not all steels are suited for it, but I'd really like to see the performance of steels in the 63-70hr range.
-Matt a.k.a. Lo_Que, loadedquestions135 I ❤ The P'KAL
"The world of edges has a small doorway in, but opens into a cavern that is both wide and deep." -sal
"The world of edges has a small doorway in, but opens into a cavern that is both wide and deep." -sal
"Ghost hunters scope the edge." -sal
- kennethsime
- Member
- Posts: 4786
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:28 pm
- Location: California
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Nevermind, I ran the image through an OCR and uploaded as a Google Sheet. Here it is, in case anyone wants to take a look.kennethsime wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 10:08 amLarrin, is there any way we could see a sortable version of this table? Or perhaps just an image sorted by TCC rather than Steel name?
Larrin, I hope that's ok. I included the source (your article) and blog name for attribution, and I'm only sharing the link here in the forum. If you'd prefer I either just make it private, or take it down entirely, I'm totally happy to. I just wanted to be able to sort the info quickly.
I'm happiest with Micarta and Tool Steel.
Top four in rotation: K390 + GCM PM2, ZCarta Shaman, Crucarta PM2, K390 + GCM Straight Spine Stretch.
Top four in rotation: K390 + GCM PM2, ZCarta Shaman, Crucarta PM2, K390 + GCM Straight Spine Stretch.
-
- Member
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:18 pm
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Moment of clarity. Their will definitely be times when a steel that maximizes one particular attribute is desired, i.e maximum corrosion resistance, or maximum toughness. But when we're discussing optimal edc blade steel, or best blade steel, what we should be looking for are those handful of steels that manage to score highly in more than one area, transcending the the traditional concept of equal tradeoffs in steel attributes. So historically if a steel is a 10 in wear resistance it is a 1 on toughness. Or if it is a 5 in wear resistance it is a 5 on toughness. The steels that manage to be a 7 on wear resistance AND a 7 in toughness, rather than a 3, those are the special steels.
- Naperville
- Member
- Posts: 4431
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:58 am
- Location: Illinois, USA
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
That is where a combination of knife design; pocket time and use; along with scientific testing comes in to play, . There is no one steel that satisfies all needs.Baron Mind wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 9:44 pmMoment of clarity. Their will definitely be times when a steel that maximizes one particular attribute is desired, i.e maximum corrosion resistance, or maximum toughness. But when we're discussing optimal edc blade steel, or best blade steel, what we should be looking for are those handful of steels that manage to score highly in more than one area, transcending the the traditional concept of equal tradeoffs in steel attributes. So historically if a steel is a 10 in wear resistance it is a 1 on toughness. Or if it is a 5 in wear resistance it is a 5 on toughness. The steels that manage to be a 7 on wear resistance AND a 7 in toughness, rather than a 3, those are the special steels.
I support the 2nd Amendment Organizations of GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF, and "Knife Rights"
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
T2T: https://tunnel2towers.org; Special Operations Wounded Warriors: https://sowwcharity.com/
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Thanks for doing this, it makes it easier to skim down the performance column and see how the steels compared head to head.kennethsime wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 9:23 pmNevermind, I ran the image through an OCR and uploaded as a Google Sheet. Here it is, in case anyone wants to take a look.
Larrin, I hope that's ok. I included the source (your article) and blog name for attribution, and I'm only sharing the link here in the forum. If you'd prefer I either just make it private, or take it down entirely, I'm totally happy to. I just wanted to be able to sort the info quickly.
- Retired from the chase -
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Early on in the website I used real tables rather than images to show data. But I had so many formatting issues with the tables I had to switch to images. Thanks for doing the OCR work and sharing it.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
- Deadboxhero
- Member
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:35 am
- Contact:
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Thanks man, its a pleasure to use. :DThe Meat man wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 9:12 amLovely edge there Shawn! :cool:Deadboxhero wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 12:22 pmWoo, very exciting Sal.
This has been in my pocket for the past month everyday.
My favorite Spyderco so far.
Well done sir.
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Here is a nice video (link below) covering the article and first and foremost giving Larrin and Shawn the credit they truly deserve for their amazing work
It explains the text and graphs at a rather basic level (not meant negatively at all, for many that certainly ia s good thing!)
https://youtu.be/TDmBQT_G9xY&t=1071s
It explains the text and graphs at a rather basic level (not meant negatively at all, for many that certainly ia s good thing!)
https://youtu.be/TDmBQT_G9xY&t=1071s
Top three going by pocket-time (update March 24):
- EDC: Endura thin red line ffg combo edge (VG10); Wayne Goddard PE (4V), Endela SE (VG10)
-Mountains/outdoors: Pac.Salt 1 SE (H1), Salt 2 SE (LC200N), and also Wayne Goddard PE (4V)
- EDC: Endura thin red line ffg combo edge (VG10); Wayne Goddard PE (4V), Endela SE (VG10)
-Mountains/outdoors: Pac.Salt 1 SE (H1), Salt 2 SE (LC200N), and also Wayne Goddard PE (4V)
-
- Member
- Posts: 3001
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Longmont, CO USA
- Contact:
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Great observation. That parallels our experience and testing--and our reasoning to keep it as a well-balanced standard of performance and affordability.ThomC wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 12:21 pmAs always, a very interesting read. I binged your articles shortly after joining the forum, and it's provided me with a lot of knowledge.
Fascinating to see S30V so high on the list after seeing it turned down as a commonplace steel. Makes me want to give it much more work in PE and SE.
Stay safe,
Mike
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Larrin, great job! Thank you for all the effort and time put into this project.
The reception was indeed great of your work except in Krazy Kutters Forum - where it is a bit rocky.
I hope we can see more steels tested soon and have rope cutting results as well. Good luck in modifying the machine for the rope.
Also kudos to Sal for offering hard to get steels including their proprietary SPY steel. I bet not many manufacturers are willing to spend the time and effort to go that extra mile. I wonder what would Konosuke say if you ask them to ship you some HD billets. :/
The reception was indeed great of your work except in Krazy Kutters Forum - where it is a bit rocky.
I hope we can see more steels tested soon and have rope cutting results as well. Good luck in modifying the machine for the rope.
Also kudos to Sal for offering hard to get steels including their proprietary SPY steel. I bet not many manufacturers are willing to spend the time and effort to go that extra mile. I wonder what would Konosuke say if you ask them to ship you some HD billets. :/
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
There's just a handful of of members on that forum who are caught up on the idea that "this one knifemaker has the best heat treat, and x steel will out cut y steel in my experience, so your test is invalid"
I'd be excited to see any future results from these tests
I'd be excited to see any future results from these tests
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Good video!Wartstein wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 3:35 amHere is a nice video (link below) covering the article and first and foremost giving Larrin and Shawn the credit they truly deserve for their amazing work
It explains the text and graphs at a rather basic level (not meant negatively at all, for many that certainly ia s good thing!)
https://youtu.be/TDmBQT_G9xY&t=1071s
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
I've been following this for awhile on instagram/youtube, both from BBB and Larrin's perspectives. I could read these results on repeat for days, amazing. What's also amazing is how well s30v and s90v performed, and I'm honestly not surprised. In regard to s90v, I'm curios if the better performance compared to its niobium brother is because the s110v steel wasn't at its peak hardness/performance (64-65hrc) compared to what s90v can attain? I'm a bit surprised too by the LC200N's low (relatively) result, but hey no steel has everything, it works great for what it's made for. I wish Spyderco would give us some s60v offerings in the future, if I may shamelessly insert this in here just because I can :D
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
S90V and S110v heat treat pretty similarly. Differences in hardness are knifemaker/manufacturer decisions.emanuel wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 11:21 amI've been following this for awhile on instagram/youtube, both from BBB and Larrin's perspectives. I could read these results on repeat for days, amazing. What's also amazing is how well s30v and s90v performed, and I'm honestly not surprised. In regard to s90v, I'm curios if the better performance compared to its niobium brother is because the s110v steel wasn't at its peak hardness/performance (64-65hrc) compared to what s90v can attain? I'm a bit surprised too by the LC200N's low (relatively) result, but hey no steel has everything, it works great for what it's made for. I wish Spyderco would give us some s60v offerings in the future, if I may shamelessly insert this in here just because I can :D
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
-
- Member
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 4:12 pm
- Location: North Central New Mexico
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Larrin & Shawn,
Do you have any hard data on s90v toughness at the 59-61 HRC that Spyderco traditionally treats to? Further, I am curious how s90v and s110v compare in toughness at similar HRC? From what I gather from your data thus far s90v should be slightly tougher?
How does s90v @60HRC compare to m390/204p/20cv? Basically, what is the toughest stainless high carbide steel?
Again, thanks so much for your hard work and the data it generates.
Do you have any hard data on s90v toughness at the 59-61 HRC that Spyderco traditionally treats to? Further, I am curious how s90v and s110v compare in toughness at similar HRC? From what I gather from your data thus far s90v should be slightly tougher?
How does s90v @60HRC compare to m390/204p/20cv? Basically, what is the toughest stainless high carbide steel?
Again, thanks so much for your hard work and the data it generates.
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
I always thought s110v can hit 2-3hrc higher than s90v. TIL. Thx! Can't wait for some future tests and refinements you have in plan for these tests. Great data.
Re: I Tested the Edge Retention of 48 Steels
Hopefully we will be able to answer those questions in the future. My guess is toughness specimens for S90V would come out closer to S110V though because I would probably compare with the same heat treatment.Cycletroll wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 12:04 pmLarrin & Shawn,
Do you have any hard data on s90v toughness at the 59-61 HRC that Spyderco traditionally treats to? Further, I am curious how s90v and s110v compare in toughness at similar HRC? From what I gather from your data thus far s90v should be slightly tougher?
How does s90v @60HRC compare to m390/204p/20cv? Basically, what is the toughest stainless high carbide steel?
Again, thanks so much for your hard work and the data it generates.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives