Spyderco UF

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
Scott Archi
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:05 pm

Spyderco UF

Postby Scott Archi » Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:19 pm

Hi guys I’m looking at getting a spyderco UF again. I had the 302 and sold it. Now I’m looking at getting it again but don’t know if I should get the 302 or 306 for the extra width. It wouldn’t really matter to me but is the price difference worth it to those that own it?

Ric
Member
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:52 pm
Location: Austria / Europe

Re: Spyderco UF

Postby Ric » Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:52 pm

I have only the UF Sharpmaker rods.

For which knives will you use it?

User avatar
Cambertree
Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:48 am
Location: Victoria, Australia

Re: Spyderco UF

Postby Cambertree » Fri May 01, 2020 8:24 am

I think only you can tell whether the 306 is worth the extra money compared to the 302. I've never regretted getting the 3" x 8" 306 UF benchstone, myself.

I use it in an adjustable Shapton stoneholder, and sometimes just as a handheld finishing stone. I got it on the recommendation of Michael Christy and Shawn Houston.

Mine needed a little finishing work, as it had kind of sharp edges and noticeable machining striations on some parts which you could feel if you ran your fingertips over the surface. After a bit of lapping in, and smoothing off the edges with SiC sandpaper, it's been a great last stone to use, both in my Chosera waterstone progression, and my Atoma/Venev diamond stone progression.

It works very nicely for large kitchen knives and chisels and plane irons too, which I believe is one of its intended purposes.

I really like it, I think it's a wonderful stone, especially on knives to be used for food, or which are used for regular push cutting type tasks.

User avatar
JacksonKnives
Member
Posts: 751
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:28 pm
Location: Formerly Alberta, now Orange County, California
Contact:

Re: Spyderco UF

Postby JacksonKnives » Fri May 01, 2020 9:19 am

For plane irons and razors, it's definitely worth it. For a longer blade with a belly, the width isn't as valuable.

User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 13167
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: Spyderco UF

Postby sal » Fri May 01, 2020 12:09 pm

Hi Scott,

Welcome to our forum.

I prefer the 3 X 8. It's just more versatile. Before we made the UF stones, I made a 1 X 8 for sharpening my straight razors and liked the results so we decided to make them in production.

sal

JD Spydo
Member
Posts: 18145
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Blue Springs, Missouri

Re: Spyderco UF

Postby JD Spydo » Fri May 01, 2020 7:24 pm

JacksonKnives wrote:
Fri May 01, 2020 9:19 am
For plane irons and razors, it's definitely worth it. For a longer blade with a belly, the width isn't as valuable.
I don't think you would regret getting any of Spyderco's great sharpening stones. I've got everything they ever made except the 306 ( which I fully intend on getting soon) and the CBN stones for the 204 Sharpmaker>> and I also intend on getting them eventually.

I consider the investment in all of my Spyderco stones some of the best money I ever did spend.

User avatar
gundamaniac
Member
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:15 pm
Location: California Bay Area

Re: Spyderco UF

Postby gundamaniac » Sat May 02, 2020 10:07 pm

I have the 302 and like it quite a lot as a finishing stone. I've been eyeing the 306 myself for blades with longer flats.


Return to “Spyderco General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: benben, Bing [Bot], curlyhairedboy, DutchBlades, Enactive, Google [Bot], JuPaul, JustinB, RandomNick, SDCowboy and 33 guests