Bloke wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:13 pm
The Meat man wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 5:45 pm
Edit to add: Evil D beat me to it. :D
Connor and D, agree 100%
I’ve not handled a Shaman either but at a glance blind Freddie can see that the knife would certainly have to be somewhat ergonomic, for a folder.
I simply find it amusing that folding knives are often described as ergonomic simply because we can get a comfortable grid on them.
I don’t think I’ve handled too many folders that felt uncomfortable while I was waving them around while sitting on the couch or opening mail but, use the same knife to say put a point on a broomstick and that “ergonomic” folder in the lounge room is a pig in true world prolonged use. :)
At the end of the day, you canny defy the laws of physics, ay?
Alex, my friend, two points on that:
1.) What you said (highlighted text)
generally touches something I do often wonder about:
Sometimes (!! not always at all!) people judge / describe features/functions on a folder as comfortable or not / possible or not / "better" or "worse" and I have a strong feeling that this is not based on their real, own, "earned", long time and prooven experience in various conditions, but in the worst case just a repetition what most others say or just based on holding the knife in the warm living room and cutting a sheet of paper... :rolleyes:
I won´t go into details, but of course for me things like "backlocks generally are slow and akward to operate", "comp.locks generally are always better than linerlocks", "one generally can´t choke up on Ricasso or eve edge of a knife" could be listed here...
2.) On the Millie ergos: You´re right, a fixed blade with a thick, contoured handle will almost always be more comfortable than a flat handled folder, but the Millie (for a folder) is REALLY very nice in hand (and I say this from my experience using it outdoors, in "harder" tasks and over longer periods of time...)