Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.

Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin blade stock?

Yes, I´d like to see a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s overall thinness (both blade stock and handle)
38
43%
Yes. I´d like to see a longer version of the Caparral while KEEPING it´s thin blade stock, but thicken the handle
12
14%
I´d like to see a blade as thin as the Chaparrals in another, longer (than the Chap) existing model (maybe specify WHICH model in a post)
15
17%
No, cause I am fundamentally not interested in longer blades
8
9%
No, I like longer blades but never that thin
7
8%
No, I don´t think such a thin blade would be robust enough in a longer knife
8
9%
 
Total votes: 88

User avatar
RobDigi
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:18 am

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby RobDigi » Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:43 am

I don't think anybody likes the Chap more than me I'm a big fan of this model,
part of the reason is I love the thin slicey blade.

But if your not doing any hard cutting...a longer blade doesn't seem necessary.
If you plan on doing some hard cutting you probably need a little thicker blade stock.

User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Wartstein » Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:52 am

RobDigi wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:43 am
I don't think anybody likes the Chap more than me I'm a big fan of this model,
part of the reason is I love the thin slicey blade.

But if your not doing any hard cutting...a longer blade doesn't seem necessary.
If you plan on doing some hard cutting you probably need a little thicker blade stock.
I have to disagree: What about food prep? Or generally cutting softer stuff with larger diameters?
Top three going by pocket-time: Endura 4 in VG 10/Micarta-scales; Stretch 1 in VG 10; Endura 4 in HAP 40

User avatar
Zatx
Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 5:26 am

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Zatx » Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:54 am

Isn't the Caly 3.5 essentially a larger Chapparal with the same thin blade?

User avatar
RobDigi
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:18 am

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby RobDigi » Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:59 am

Wartstein wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:52 am
RobDigi wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:43 am
I don't think anybody likes the Chap more than me I'm a big fan of this model,
part of the reason is I love the thin slicey blade.

But if your not doing any hard cutting...a longer blade doesn't seem necessary.
If you plan on doing some hard cutting you probably need a little thicker blade stock.
I have to disagree: What about food prep? Or generally cutting softer stuff with larger diameters?
I would probably buy a longer version just because I like the thin blade ..
I don't know tho the Chap already feels like I could bend it pretty easy!!

User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Wartstein » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:07 am

Zatx wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:54 am
Isn't the Caly 3.5 essentially a larger Chapparal with the same thin blade?
Caly has 3mm bladestock as far as I recall, Chap 2mm..
Top three going by pocket-time: Endura 4 in VG 10/Micarta-scales; Stretch 1 in VG 10; Endura 4 in HAP 40

User avatar
The Deacon
Member
Posts: 25083
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Upstate SC, USA
Contact:

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby The Deacon » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:25 am

Peter1960 wrote:
Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:17 pm
The Deacon wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 3:13 pm
While I love the Chaparral, I'm not sure how well its handle would scale up. To be honest, my "ideal" Spyderco would be a Stretch (preferably the size of a 1st Gen Stretch 1) with a 2mm thick (or thinner) VG-10 blade...
My thoughts and wish also ... will it ever happen?

I'd say there's zero chance of it happening as I described it. They'd pretty much have to start from scratch, as none of the parts from the 1st Gen. Stretch 1 (SS/Kraton handled version) would be usable, and the tooling may not even exist anymore. One based on the 2nd Gen Stretch 1 (assuming the tooling still exists) or the Stretch 2 might be more feasible, at least some parts would be usable. Still, the Stretch is something of a niche model to begin with. Not everyone who likes it would want a thinner blade, and there'd be at least some risk of sales being negatively impacted by knuckle draggers making YouTube videos showing them using one as a sharpened prybar with the inevitable result. The way I see it, the Chaparral is positioned as a gent's knife, so fewer people are going to buy it for "hard use".

Zatx wrote: Isn't the Caly 3.5 essentially a larger Chapparal with the same thin blade?

No. The Caly 3.5, Cal3, Calypso, and Calypso Jr. all have 3mm thick blades, while the Chaparral has a thinner, 2mm thick, blade.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!

User avatar
Jazz
Member
Posts: 7463
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Jazz » Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:15 am

Wartstein wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:30 am

Thanks for your input! Not always better, correct, but maybe an interesting option in some applications? Lateral forced do not ALWAYS happen... ;)

:) Yeah, I know, bro. I'm really liking the Natives lately because they still slice just great, and they're thicker than the Delica (stronger).
- best wishes, Jazz.

User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Wartstein » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:43 am

Jazz wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:15 am
Wartstein wrote:
Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:30 am

Thanks for your input! Not always better, correct, but maybe an interesting option in some applications? Lateral forced do not ALWAYS happen... ;)

:) Yeah, I know, bro. I'm really liking the Natives lately because they still slice just great, and they're thicker than the Delica (stronger).
I somehow like my Native but find myself not carrying it too often: It has just the size in which a fingerchoil is somewhat annoying to me: The Native is not so small that you would NEED a choil to get a good 4 finger grip (if the rear part of the choil wouldn´t take away grip area on the handle), but small enough that the remaining blade length in front of the choil is rather short... Imho choils are ok in really small and than again in rather large knifes, not in native-sized ones...
Top three going by pocket-time: Endura 4 in VG 10/Micarta-scales; Stretch 1 in VG 10; Endura 4 in HAP 40

User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 8134
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Doc Dan » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:34 pm

I have changed my mind. This is a good idea.
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

"Until we meet again, may the good Lord take a liking to you."
(Roy Rogers)


NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050

User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Wartstein » Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:31 am

Doc Dan wrote:
Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:34 pm
I have changed my mind. This is a good idea.
OP here, glad you like the idea. :)
Hope Sal considers contemplating a longer Chap...
Top three going by pocket-time: Endura 4 in VG 10/Micarta-scales; Stretch 1 in VG 10; Endura 4 in HAP 40

User avatar
MichaelScott
Member
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:42 am
Location: Southern Colorado

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby MichaelScott » Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:46 pm

There is not a “no” choice in the poll. Never the less, I vote no. The Chaparral is a highly refined knife and doesn’t need changes. I’d say get a thin blade knife that’s a bit longer although I don’t see what practical difference that would make.
What doesn’t kill you will make you stronger. Except infantry. Infantry will kill you.

“Gentlemen, bring out your men.” — T. J. Jackson, Second Manassas, 1862

http://acehotel.blog

User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Wartstein » Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:10 am

MichaelScott wrote:
Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:46 pm
There is not a “no” choice in the poll. Never the less, I vote no. The Chaparral is a highly refined knife and doesn’t need changes. I’d say get a thin blade knife that’s a bit longer although I don’t see what practical difference that would make.
Actually I offer 3 "no"-choices in the poll, but I guess you mean just plaln "no" without any preformulated reason for it? You'd be right, that's missing

Just out of interest: In your last sentence you mean "what a practical difference" a longer blade or a thinner blade would make?Especially a thin, slicey blade profits from beeing a bit longer in my experience: Lends itself towards foodprep, where often things with larger diameters are to be cut. Even a cardboard slicing motion works more smoothly and better with a longer thin blade Imho.
And generally such a quite thin blade (2mm) longer than 3 " is missing in Spydercos lineup as far as I am aware of.
Top three going by pocket-time: Endura 4 in VG 10/Micarta-scales; Stretch 1 in VG 10; Endura 4 in HAP 40

User avatar
xceptnl
Member
Posts: 8353
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm
Location: Tobacco Country, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby xceptnl » Thu Feb 07, 2019 5:17 am

I have been a believer in thinner and thinner blade stock since purchasing my first regrind. Fast forward a few years and getting to experience the 1.7mm stock of the original FFG, MBS-26 Catcherman has taken this belief to a whole new level. I would prefer a Caly 3.5 in this thin stock. I think given the right steel and heat treat that a durable slicer could be produced in 2mm or less.
Image
sal wrote: .... even today, we design a knife from the edge out!
*Landon*

User avatar
Wartstein
Member
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:06 am
Location: Salzburg, Austria, Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby Wartstein » Thu Feb 07, 2019 5:26 am

xceptnl wrote:
Thu Feb 07, 2019 5:17 am
I have been a believer in thinner and thinner blade stock since purchasing my first regrind. Fast forward a few years and getting to experience the 1.7mm stock of the original FFG, MBS-26 Catcherman has taken this belief to a whole new level. I would prefer a Caly 3.5 in this thin stock. I think given the right steel and heat treat that a durable slicer could be produced in 2mm or less.
Never owned a Caly, but just from the looks of it I see where you're coming from. I think probably a thinner Caly would be as good as a longer Chap.
Top three going by pocket-time: Endura 4 in VG 10/Micarta-scales; Stretch 1 in VG 10; Endura 4 in HAP 40

User avatar
elena86
Member
Posts: 2647
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:59 am
Location: Somewhere in Europe

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby elena86 » Thu Feb 07, 2019 7:08 am

A Caly3.5 with a 2.5 mm blade stock ground very thin behind the edge would be my choice.
Marius

" A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. It makes the hand bleed that uses it " ( Rabindranath Tagore )

User avatar
youmakemehole
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:42 am

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby youmakemehole » Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:52 am

Something like an even thinner Sage 2 would be the perfect thing I think for many people. If anyone here has owned a Cold Steel Code4 they'd know that you can fit a very thick blade suited for fairly hard use(by folder standards) and fit it in aluminum scales so thin it almost dissappears in your pocket but is also tough and sturdy enough to out perform 99% of folders out there - according to their stress tests. Now if you make Sage, and slap the same handles/hardware/washers similar to the Code4 as far as the slimness of profile goes, and then thin the blade just a tad bit more, youd have a beautiful slicer-oriented spyderco version of a code4, but even thinner... almost uncomprehendable considering how thin the code4 is, but so is the chaparral. I love the code4, it is such a tough and massive folder that is so thin it can be carried around with such incredible ease, id imagine a sage built like it (but thinner and for less hard use) would be the bees knees for sure.
"Sometimes I think that we're all little kids trying to act like grown ups, in our parents clothes. ;) "

-sal

hungryboy
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 5:29 pm

Re: Poll: Interested in a longer version of the Chaparral while KEEPING it´s thin bladestock??

Postby hungryboy » Sat Feb 09, 2019 6:58 am

I'd like a longer version. For me I'd prefer a 31/2 to 4" blade. A seriously good food prep knife.

FRN handle would be fine for this utility/camping kitchen knife.


Return to “Spyderco General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bbturbodad, blues, buckleys, Cambertree, Frozenspyder, Google [Bot], gundamaniac, Johncjeff, JuPaul, MSN [Bot], Ratamaque, Spydergirl88, Surfingringo, timlara, Wright.88 and 34 guests