Is it useful though?Evil D wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:25 pmDaveho wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:21 pmTrue, I’m sure if you use knives as intended you never have an issue.Evil D wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:09 pm
I haven't seen either fail, I'd imagine they crack and snap. We did have a guy break the blade off a Manix 2 LW when it first came out but the handle was fine. I've done some fairly hard use with one and the only issue I had with it was hot spots from how square the handle is.
But watching folk on YouTube hammer knives into trees and standing/bouncing on them... common sense comes cheap but ain’t that’s common.
Yeah it's a touchy subject. I actually talked some trash about Jim Anderson once when he did a hard use test on a Manix 2 because I just didn't see the point. Now I've come to understand that it's beneficial to know what a tool's breaking point is so I would actually like to know how these materials fail even if I never push them that far. Some of it is just senseless abuse for the sake of getting video views but a proper test format can tell us a lot of useful information.
in that situation are linerless folders the correct tool for the job, personally I don’t think so however that’s because that isn’t something I value.
For example when I built the engine for my DC2 I’ve assembled components and machining tolerances so the engine will reliably take revving to 11k however the design of the engine overall and the tune have the engine only making power to 8.5k so there is nothing to gain to flog it beyond that.
It strikes me as breaking knives for the sake of breaking knives.
But that’s just my useage..
And for what it’s worth here we are one day from spring and still have -4c degree nights.