Mushroom wrote: ↑Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:49 pmThe 3 in the "Para 3" name does refer to the blade length, not its place in the lineup. So, a "Para 2.5" would insinuate a 2.5" blade.Evil D wrote: ↑Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:52 pmI think he might be referring to the number sequence...the 3 doesn't refer to blade length, only that it's the 3rd Paramilitary version. A 2.5 would be between the 2 and 3 and I guess share traits of both.Daveho wrote: ↑Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:33 pmThanks for the video, you raised some interesting points but in what world would a parra 2.5 have a 3.25” blade, this is lunacy.
I would happily embrace a parra variant with a 2.5” blade as that’s where I thought you where going :)
It would be like a normal shaped rhino.
*god that’s a weird sentence*
From the December 2016 Spyderco Byte: "...Although clearly based on the Para Military 2, the Para 3 was not named the “Para Military 3” because its smaller size qualifies it as a different knife design. Similarly, the “3” in its name actually reflects its three-inch blade length rather than identifying it as a third-generation of the Para Military design..."
If the Paramilitary 2 ever sees enough of a design change to warrant changing the name, it would likely be Paramilitary 3.
I suspect the knife suggested by ALuckyBum would be a confusing one to name. Is it part of the Para line or Paramilitary line? I would guess the name to be "Para 3.25", if the same handle remained from the Para 3.
See that just proves how confusing it is lol. The 3 in Para 3 refers to length while the 2 in Para 2 refers to version.