araneae wrote:Curious what makes the price make sense for you when you haven't handled one to compare and you don't know how the steel compares?
Ah, fair question. I was mainly making the point that the market in general seems to be preferring D2 as a better-than-8Cr steel and from a marketability point of view BD1 doesn't do this line any favors. I only briefly owned a BD1 Spyderco and all I know is it sharpens easy. Given the choice of a $40 Tenacious and a $60 Polestar I think I'd just take the Tenacious. If I handled a Polestar I suspect I'd realize whatever effort Sal put into the knife is worth the extra $20.
But that's me. It's good to remember that while most of us don't blink at a $60 knife, for a lot of people that's the very top end of their knife budget.
steelcity16 wrote:So in short, for Spyderco knives, at least for me, they would have to be Ganzo-level prices to get me to open my wallet for any China/Taiwan made knives.
This is an often discussed topic, but I would say we're past the point where Chinese knives are automatically suspect. It's kind of a mess, some brands have very poor crap from China
and good knives from China. Spyderco seems to only be making good knives in China. And then there's some brands that only make super high end knives in China.
Taiwanese Spyderco's have long been well regarded.
sal wrote:You would prefer a back-lock to a Linerlock. What is your favorite lock? You do get to play with all of them.
sal
I think for value folders the liner lock makes great sense. Especially since the Tenacious line has great liner locks (robust, easy to access). I used to avoid liner locks but so many great designs out there use them and I got used to it.
CBB is my favorite, but it's not the kind of lock you can shove into any design, I get that. Nothing wrong with a good back lock either.