awesome!sal wrote:Hi Speekills,
Michael Janich designed the Yojimbo's so I'll see if he can answer you.
sal
what about your design the Mili? and Eric's para and manix?
choil for safety first or just by product
awesome!sal wrote:Hi Speekills,
Michael Janich designed the Yojimbo's so I'll see if he can answer you.
sal
Thanks for the reply Mike!Michael Janich wrote:Dear Speedkills:speedkills wrote:I have a Question regarding this topic for Sal or anyone in the know. Was the 50/50 choil and the space behind the edge on the Yojimbo designed first and foremost as a safety and finger saver if the lock were to disengage during use. Or was it designed for the choked up grip and the safety benefit is just a great by product of the design? thanks in advance for any thought and input.
The area between the edge and handle of the Yo 2 was not intended as a 50/50 choil or a "finger saver." It aligns with the release tab of the Compression Lock when the blade is closed and keeps your fingertip from getting bitten by the edge when you close the knife quickly.
Stay safe,
Mike
I stand by you on no finger biters!ZrowsN1s wrote:I was actually just about to post that I thought it had more to do with the placement of the blade in relation to the lock tab....
... than as a finger saver....
...or for use as a choil....
(I never hold it like this)
That being said, I stand by my rule, no finger biters :D
speedkills wrote:I stand by you on no finger biters!ZrowsN1s wrote:I was actually just about to post that I thought it had more to do with the placement of the blade in relation to the lock tab....
... than as a finger saver....
...or for use as a choil....
(I never hold it like this)
That being said, I stand by my rule, no finger biters :D
Now what about the Mili, para and manix? was a safety the first reason for the choil or a by product of a place to choke up?
ZrowsN1s wrote:I don't know, but I'm betting ergonomics was a larger design consideration than finger safety for the PM2. Finger safety is an added (maybe even unintended) benefit of the choil. I didn't buy my first PM2 thinking of finger safety, but it was one of the first things I noticed. Before Spyderco I was a big fan of another knife co, and ALL of their knives are finger bitters. You accidentally close one of those, you could lose a finger. When I discovered that Spyderco knives didn't do that, I knew then and there it was going to be a deciding factor in my future knife purchases.
In a related story of unintended benefits of design, the Emerson "Wave" wasn't designed to be a remote pocket opener, it was designed to be a thumb ramp and blade catch. After making the first few prototypes, they 'discovered' they had invented a new way to open a knife. I'm not sure if the chicken or the egg came first here, but I sure love omelets :D
Both Eric and I are more about performance. The finger choil allows one to get close to the edge with control. So, Ergos, control, safety.speedkills wrote:awesome!sal wrote:Hi Speekills,
Michael Janich designed the Yojimbo's so I'll see if he can answer you.
sal
what about your design the Mili? and Eric's para and manix?
choil for safety first or just by product
sal wrote:Both Eric and I are more about performance. The finger choil allows one to get close to the edge with control. So, Ergos, control, safety.speedkills wrote:awesome!sal wrote:Hi Speekills,
Michael Janich designed the Yojimbo's so I'll see if he can answer you.
sal
what about your design the Mili? and Eric's para and manix?
choil for safety first or just by product
sal
The safety issue we are referring to is not inexperienced knife users closing the knife and nicking their finger. We are talking the lock failing during use and the blade closing on your index finger and possibly guillotining your finger off. Lot of knife companys are obsessed with lock strength and how much weight the blade can hold and how many spine whacks the knife can take before lock failure. Regardless of how strong the lock is folding knives fold and the best lock can fail. Having a choil though is guaranteed safety that if the lock fails you will not loose a finger. My opinion the choil is much more important then the strength of the lock and I won't own knives in my collection that don't have a choil or finger catch like the yojimbo, delica or endura.gaj999 wrote:I've gotten rid of all my knives with choils, save the Perrin Bowie. That one works for me. I've only got one left with a 50/50 choil, the Super Blue Stretch, and I've been planning to get rid of that. I've been using folding knives for 50 years and have never, ever nicked myself closing one, so I don't get the safety issue. Maybe not getting my hands on a locking folder until I'd been using knives for a long time was good training. My current favorite EDC for in town is the Des Horn, so lack of a choil and/or a guard isn't an issue. It's a brilliant design that looks on paper like it would be both uncomfortable and prone to leaving fingers all over the floor. In hand, it's the opposite. Anyway, as to back locks and the space required, I prefer designs like the Centofante 3 and 4, which give up a little apparent edge/handle ratio and allow me to get my finger close to the edge comfortably. As to the issues with big knives and tip control and tiny knives and grip, it isn't an issue for me. I've found that the sweet spot for me for a folder is a blade around 3 inches. Folders more than a half inch from there just don't end up sticking around and I've quit buying them, although I do like the looks of the Q-ball and might have to waste some time and money playing with it. :)
Gotcha. If lock failure results in you getting cut, you're using the knife improperly. A lock is a safety feature that protects you in the case of misuse, accidental or otherwise. It should never be relied on, no matter how well designed or built. It's just like gun safety - don't point one at anything you'd mind having a hole in, even if you know it's not loaded, the safety is on, and there's a cleaning rod sticking out of the barrel. Why? Because people make mistakes and things fail. This way it takes two mistakes or failures for an injury to happen. If both are unlikely, that reduces the chance of injury to near zero. An example: you accidentally snag the tip on something that places closing force on the blade. You're fine unless the lock fails. That's not likely. If you want to stab things with your knife, buy a knife designed for stabbing things. It might break in half, but it will never, ever fold onto your fingers ...speedkills wrote:The safety issue we are referring to is not inexperienced knife users closing the knife and nicking their finger. We are talking the lock failing during use and the blade closing on your index finger and possibly guillotining your finger off.
I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with that statement.gaj999 wrote:Gotcha. If lock failure results in you getting cut, you're using the knife improperly. A lock is a safety feature that protects you in the case of misuse, accidental or otherwise. It should never be relied on, no matter how well designed or built. ........speedkills wrote:The safety issue we are referring to is not inexperienced knife users closing the knife and nicking their finger. We are talking the lock failing during use and the blade closing on your index finger and possibly guillotining your finger off.
This way it takes two mistakes or failures for an injury to happen. If both are unlikely, that reduces the chance of injury to near zero. An example: you accidentally snag the tip on something that places closing force on the blade. You're fine unless the lock fails. That's not likely. If you want to stab things with your knife, buy a knife designed for stabbing things. It might break in half, but it will never, ever fold onto your fingers ...
Yes, it's your fault, but not for owning the knife. Knives are cutting tools and you cut with the sharp part. That means the sharp part is where force is applied. If you're doing anything but cutting with a knife, you're using it wrong. Yes, we sometimes do use knives wrong. We all do. But it should be a calculated risk made with the knowledge that things could go badly wrong very quickly. If the lock happens to fail as you're doing so, it is your fault and not that of the lock maker or anyone else.ZrowsN1s wrote:If lock failure results in you getting cut, that's your fault? I don't really see it that way. (although I suppose if you own a knife capable of biting your fingers when it accidentally closes, maybe it IS your fault on some level if it happens)
It's not your only safety, but it IS your primary safety. That way, you have to make a mistake in use and then have the lock fail at the same time to get hurt. If you seldom make a mistake and the lock seldom fails, you'll get struck by lightning more often than you get cut that way ... The perfect analogy is the gun safety. "I want a safety so good that I feel comfortable pointing this thing at my mother." Um, really?ZrowsN1s wrote:Besides the fact that I don't want treating all my knives like slip-joints (that can't take any pressure on the spine of the blade) to be my only saftey from lock failure....
We're far apart here. I'm realistic enough about my skills to know that if I need a knife for SD, I'm basically screwed. If I really think I might need something, I take a gun. Heck, I'd much rather have a nice stick than a knife if things get crazy.ZrowsN1s wrote: I also carry knives for self defense, they need to be reliable.
In an emergency, all bets are off, along with your brain. It's all training and muscle memory. As to opening and closing, let's step back a minute. What does a lock have to do with opening technique? Nothing. We all can see that a lock complicates closing technique, actually making it riskier. We're willing to take that extra risk because the lock provides a backup at times when there may be a lot of force on the blade. If safe opening and closing is the top priority, you should buy a slipjoint. Seriously.ZrowsN1s wrote: No ones opening and closing technique is immune to failure (especially in an emergency).
They make those. Spyderco makes some nice ones. They're called fixed blades. :)ZrowsN1s wrote:Before I changed it to "Carrying 3 knives is perfectly normal" my signature line was "Hope for the best. Plan for the worst.". Instead of trying to never put "closing force" on the blade, or relying on a lock to save my fingers if I do, I prefer a knife that is incapable of closing on my fingers in the first place, regardless of the reliability of the lock or my knife handling technique.
I think we are misunderstanding eachother. I shouldn't have got stuck on who's fault lock failure is. We can agree to disagree or argue that another time. It's a distraction from the point that I don't care who's fault it is, I don't want failure to result in injury. And that I will continue to judge my future knife puchaces with this in mind.gaj999 wrote:I feel like we're sort of agreeing but not fully understanding each other. I'll try for some clarification ...
.... :)