Mule Team HRc Information

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Mule Team HRc Information

Postby JNewell » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:50 pm

I got tired of continually searching for information on the Rockwell C ranges for Spyderco Mule series blades, so I thought I'd collect the information in a single post and edit it as new blades are released and tested. The information below comes mostly from posts by JLS and Ankerson here and at BladeForums (many thanks to both and to all others who've posted information). Please feel free to post additional information or questions below. I'm only playing editor here rather than an expert authority, but I'm sure that forum members can field just about any question.

For information on the Mule program generally, note that Spyderco has posted a very useful page with information on the Mule series and the individual blades here: http://spyderco.com/edge-u-cation/index.php?item=13

MT01P - Mule Team 52100 - January 2008 (US)
From the Spyderco Edge-u-cation sheet: "Oil quenched and drawn to Rc 62"
JLS wrote:Good thing you said no pressure! Otherwise I'd be worried about the repercussions of waiting this long. ;)

I finally stopped in at my old work last week and I have some additional results.

MT01 - 52100 - 3 tests; 63.1 HRC average
MT08 - Super Blue - 3 tests; 62.5 HRC average
MT13 - ELMAX - 3 tests; 58.3 HRC average

I still haven't found the test results for MT06 and MT10. If they're not in some old spreadsheets, they're lost and I don't know that I want to know the hardness bad enough to tear the handles off (once they're epoxied on, they stay that way...at least how I do it).
MT02P - Mule Team CPM-M4™ - October 2008 (Crucible/US)
JLS wrote:Well, I still haven't found my spreadsheet with the actual numbers on the M4. But my memory isn't too bad and here's what I can recall. The others are from either notes at my desk at work or posts here.
MT02-CPM-M4 - 62.5 HRC
MT03-CPM-S90V - 59.2 HRC
MT04 - ZDP189 - 66.4 HRC, this is the average of 6 readings that ranged from 65.2 to 67.1 HRC
Hope this helps.
MT03P - Mule Team CPMS90V™ - February 2009 (Crucible/US)
JLS wrote:Well, I still haven't found my spreadsheet with the actual numbers on the M4. But my memory isn't too bad and here's what I can recall. The others are from either notes at my desk at work or posts here.
MT02-CPM-M4 - 62.5 HRC
MT03-CPM-S90V - 59.2 HRC
MT04 - ZDP189 - 66.4 HRC, this is the average of 6 readings that ranged from 65.2 to 67.1 HRC
Hope this helps.
JLS wrote:Ok, so I finally took the time to test my new Mule and my Military 2nd that I have on hand. All these are averages of 3 tests. The calibration just before was an average of 56.1 on a 56.4 HRC test block. Since that's within tolerances, the numbers below are straight reporting, no adjustment in numbers due to the calibration error.
Mule - 59.2 HRC
Military - 58.8 HRC
Keep in mind some of the earlier comments about accuracy of calibration blocks and of the test itself and you'll see that this is right where it needs to be.
MT04P - Mule Team ZDP-189 - July 2009 (Hitachi/Japan)
JLS wrote:My first one tested at 67 HRC average.
I haven't unboxed the second to take it to work for testing yet. If I ever do, I'll report on that.
JLS wrote:Well, I still haven't found my spreadsheet with the actual numbers on the M4. But my memory isn't too bad and here's what I can recall. The others are from either notes at my desk at work or posts here.
MT02-CPM-M4 - 62.5 HRC
MT03-CPM-S90V - 59.2 HRC
MT04 - ZDP189 - 66.4 HRC, this is the average of 6 readings that ranged from 65.2 to 67.1 HRC
Hope this helps.
JLS wrote:Gunmike inspired me to take my Mule to work and hardness test it. My 6 readings ranged from 65.2 to 67.1 HRC. It's definitely the hardest steel I've ever tested.
I'll be interested to see the readings from others.
This definitely takes it out of the EDC category, but should work real nice on my workbench.
MT05P - Mule Team 9Cr18Mo - October 2009 (China)
JLS wrote:Average of 6 readings was 58.0 HRC, with a high and low of 58.6 and 57.7.
JLS wrote:I'm really not trying to hog the thread, but it's seems I am anyway.
I've hardness tested 6 of the blades so far and here are the results.
59.3
58.9
59.1
59.1
59.1
58.9
All but one of those numbers represents an average of 2 tests. If you're not familiar with heat treating and hardness tests, that is amazing consistency.
As I was doing the hardness tests after work, two more guys found me and want Mules. For $20, it's hard to refuse.

MT06P - Mule Team CPM-S35VN™ - January 2010 (Crucible/US)
Ankerson wrote:Updated HRC ratings on S35VN and ATS-34. :)
Both came in at 59 HRC.
MT07P - Mule Team Damascus VG-10 - October 2010 (Japan)
[No test data found yet]

MT08P - Mule Team Aogami Super Blue - December 2010 (Hitachi/Japan)
sal wrote:Hi Charlie,

They're running about 62. 61.5 on the low side 63 on the high side.

sal
Ankerson wrote:John,

The Super Blue was 61.5 HRC.

Jim
JLS wrote:Good thing you said no pressure! Otherwise I'd be worried about the repercussions of waiting this long. ;)

I finally stopped in at my old work last week and I have some additional results.

MT01 - 52100 - 3 tests; 63.1 HRC average
MT08 - Super Blue - 3 tests; 62.5 HRC average
MT13 - ELMAX - 3 tests; 58.3 HRC average

I still haven't found the test results for MT06 and MT10. If they're not in some old spreadsheets, they're lost and I don't know that I want to know the hardness bad enough to tear the handles off (once they're epoxied on, they stay that way...at least how I do it).
MT09 - Mule Team Cobalt Special - February 2011 (Takefu/Japan)
[No test data found yet]

MT10P - Mule Team CTS-BD1 - June 2010 (Carpenter/US)
JLS wrote:I have hardness testing for two more.

I found a MT-10 BD-1 Mule on Ebay for a decent price and removed the scales when it arrived as they were nearly 1/2" thick each. It tested at 57.2 HRC, which seems a little low, so I'd like to put the disclaimer that it was used of unknown origins. Other than that, the blade was clean and flat and the machine was freshly calibrated.

I also tested the CTS-XHP Mule and it was 60.3 HRC. Now to get some handles on it and start seeing what this steel is capable of.
MT11P - M390 Mule Team - June 2011 (Böhler-Uddeholm/Austria)
Ankerson wrote:Update. :)
M390 Mule came in at 60.5 HRC..
JLS wrote:I finally ordered my M390 Mule last week and received it yesterday.
I brought it to work today, did a fresh cal on the hardness tester and got 60.9 and 61.2 HRC for the two samples. I think I'm going to like this one.
MT12P - Cru-Wear Mule Team - September 2011 (Crucible/US)
JLS wrote:I posted this in the MT12 re-release thread, but I figured that inquiring minds wanted to know.

I no longer work where I have a hardness tester in the next lab, but I left on very good terms and I stopped in to test my Cruwear mule this evening. I checked calibration before testing and I like the results. Please keep in mind, these were 3 tests on a single Mule. But I like the direction they point.
In case my writing is illegible, the numbers are 62.1, 62.2 and 62.8 HRC.
MT13 Elmax Mule Team - February 2012 (Böhler-Uddeholm/Austria)
Ankerson wrote:Updated info in the MT-13 Elmax Mule Team - February 2012

I have one here that is 58.5 ave HRC.
Sal Glesser wrote:Hi Dan. I believe we're running 59/60. I'll check for sure on Monay.

sal
Sal Glesser wrote:Hi Dan,

The one I checked was 58.2.

sal
JLS wrote:Good thing you said no pressure! Otherwise I'd be worried about the repercussions of waiting this long. ;)

I finally stopped in at my old work last week and I have some additional results.

MT01 - 52100 - 3 tests; 63.1 HRC average
MT08 - Super Blue - 3 tests; 62.5 HRC average
MT13 - ELMAX - 3 tests; 58.3 HRC average

I still haven't found the test results for MT06 and MT10. If they're not in some old spreadsheets, they're lost and I don't know that I want to know the hardness bad enough to tear the handles off (once they're epoxied on, they stay that way...at least how I do it).
MT14 CTS-204P Mule Team - "Coming Soon" 2/12 (Carpenter/US)
[No test data found yet]

MT15 CTS-B75P Mule Team - September 2012 (Carpenter/US)
sal wrote:Target was 62/63. Mine Rc'd at 62.5.

sal
JLS wrote:One more test to add. Stopped in at my old work yesterday and I think the results on the MT-15 CTS B75P Mule will be encouraging. I did a fresh calibration and tested my blade 3 times. 62.7, 62.2 and 62.9 for an average of 62.6 HRC.
MT16 - CTS-XHP - December 2012 (Carpenter/US)
JLS wrote:I have hardness testing for two more.

I found a MT-10 BD-1 Mule on Ebay for a decent price and removed the scales when it arrived as they were nearly 1/2" thick each. It tested at 57.2 HRC, which seems a little low, so I'd like to put the disclaimer that it was used of unknown origins. Other than that, the blade was clean and flat and the machine was freshly calibrated.

I also tested the CTS-XHP Mule and it was 60.3 HRC. Now to get some handles on it and start seeing what this steel is capable of.
MT17 - K390 Mule Team - July 2013 (Böhler-Uddeholm/Austria)
sal wrote:The one I tested on the handle was 62/64.

sal
-> CONTINUES IN NEXT POST <-


7/20/13 - Added MT-17
Last edited by JNewell on Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:51 pm

Continued from post #1:

MT17 - K390 Mule Team - July 2013 (Böhler-Uddeholm/Austria)
sal wrote:The one I tested on the handle was 62/64.

sal
JLS wrote:Finally tested my K390 Mule.

63.8-64.1 HRC spread over 3 tests. This should be good!
MT18 - CPM-S110V Mule Team - July 2013 (Crucible/US)
Sal Glesser wrote:60-61

sal
JLS wrote:Just wanted to share hardness test results on my S110V Mule that I feel very lucky to have snagged on Monday.

For some background, calibration on a Rockwell hardness test machine is verified on a test block that normally has a +/- 1HRC tolerance on it. These test blocks come in various ranges and it's important to verify calibration as close to the expected range as possible. The test block was a 55.6 HRC test block. The calibration was at the lower end of acceptable (54.7 HRC) on the test block, but still in tolerance so I'll report the raw numbers. I got measurements between 58.7 HRC towards the butt end of the tang to 59.4 HRC just behind the plunge line. That's very good consistency, but perhaps not as high as I would've liked to see. It's still going to be a beast of a knife with regard to edge holding, but it may be some of the reason it didn't rank as high as I might have expected in Jim Ankerson's testing. I know he said he'd be sending his out for hardness testing as well; it'll be interesting to see those results as well.

Cliff Notes version - MT18, S110V hardness test results, average of 5 tests on one blade, 59.1 HRC
Ankerson wrote:I think it would be safe to call it 60 RC given the variation [between the test block and the results].

That puts it right on the money of what Sal stated.
Ankerson wrote:The hardness data came back as 60 RC. :)
MT19 - PSF27 Mule Team - August 2014 (SB Specialty Metals/US)

No data yet

9/6/13 - MT-17 Updated
1/27/14 - MT-18 Added
2/22/14 - MT-18 updated
3/1/14 - MT-18 updated
2/28/15 - MT19 added
Last edited by JNewell on Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:52 pm

This space also for future posts

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:57 pm

One more blank...

User avatar
jabba359
Member
Posts: 4810
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: North Hollywood, CA U.S.A. Earth
Contact:

Postby jabba359 » Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:15 pm

Thanks for putting this together. I used it to update some of the Spydiewiki data that I hadn't found yet. Sal posted his Rc test findings for MT08:

sal wrote:
dbcad wrote:I'm still curious about what the HT will be, but decided to order one anyway. If Japanese knife makers value it, it must be for a reason, probably those stated in previous replies. Looking forward to the Super Blue :)
Hi Charlie,

They're running about 62. 61.5 on the low side 63 on the high side.

sal
-Kyle

:spyder:
Latest arrivals: GITD Delica 4, Damascus Delica 4, CPM-4V Lil' Native

http://www.spydiewiki.com

bchan
Member
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:51 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby bchan » Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:20 pm

JNewell, thank you for your efforts. I particularly like the fact that you also provide sources for your figures. I think this should be a sticky because the Mules are an on-going project.

JLS
Member
Posts: 946
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:46 am
Location: Utah

Postby JLS » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:04 am

JNewell, thanks for putting this together. I've thought about it a couple of times, but just never did it. I don't think we'll ever see good hardness test results on MT07 or MT09 due to the laminated construction of each.

I do have a spare MT01 and MT08 blade here that I can test before I put a handle on each. I also did test my MT06 and MT10 (they each have the dimple), but don't have the numbers handy. I'll try to look them up and get them posted. It'll probably be at least a week and a half until I do because I'm heading out for business and won't be back for a week.

I hope Sal and company don't mind me posting the test results. I try to caution everyone that these tests are merely representative of my blades. It doesn't mean your blade is exactly the same, but it does give a ballpark idea for most people. We also need to remember that hardness alone without a proper heat treat cycle or parameters is worthless. I trust Spyderco to work up a proper heat treat because they have yet to disappoint me. I've hardness tested older blades when they used to advertise the hardness and every single one was in spec.

I've been very enthusiastic about the Mule Team project since I heard of it. I missed the debut of MT01, but picked up 2 after they were sold out. I've been pretty quick on every other one since and enjoy using them daily. To truth, the Mule Team project is what brought me back after a hiatus of a few years. I haven't bought many folders since coming back, but I've really liked the fixed blades.

As long as I can still get in the door at my old work, I'll keep providing test results. They don't seem to mind me coming back, so that should be for quite some time.
42 Spyderco fixed blades and counting...

Bill1170
Member
Posts: 1795
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Postby Bill1170 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:13 am

This thread is a great idea. I look forward to seeing the data trickle in on all the mules. Thanks for doing this.

User avatar
toomzz
Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:31 am
Location: Netherlands Earth

Postby toomzz » Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:17 am

Thanks for you efforts! Looking forward to the Elmax, and.....MT14 in CTS 204P later this year.
Tom

User avatar
xceptnl
Member
Posts: 8350
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm
Location: Tobacco Country, Virginia
Contact:

Postby xceptnl » Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:39 am

Thanks a ton JNewell. This data will prove very helpful to all in the future. I agree with bchan, this should be a sticky thread!
Image
sal wrote: .... even today, we design a knife from the edge out!
*Landon*

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:44 am

JLS, all - glad this is helpful and a big thanks to JLS, Jim Ankerson and the whole group for the data we have now and the data that will be contributed as the Mule program continues. :spyder:

JLS, any additional testing data would be really welcome, and would be a great update! No pressure, of course... ;)

John
JLS wrote:JNewell, thanks for putting this together. I've thought about it a couple of times, but just never did it. I don't think we'll ever see good hardness test results on MT07 or MT09 due to the laminated construction of each.

I do have a spare MT01 and MT08 blade here that I can test before I put a handle on each. I also did test my MT06 and MT10 (they each have the dimple), but don't have the numbers handy. I'll try to look them up and get them posted. It'll probably be at least a week and a half until I do because I'm heading out for business and won't be back for a week.

I hope Sal and company don't mind me posting the test results. I try to caution everyone that these tests are merely representative of my blades. It doesn't mean your blade is exactly the same, but it does give a ballpark idea for most people. We also need to remember that hardness alone without a proper heat treat cycle or parameters is worthless. I trust Spyderco to work up a proper heat treat because they have yet to disappoint me. I've hardness tested older blades when they used to advertise the hardness and every single one was in spec.

I've been very enthusiastic about the Mule Team project since I heard of it. I missed the debut of MT01, but picked up 2 after they were sold out. I've been pretty quick on every other one since and enjoy using them daily. To truth, the Mule Team project is what brought me back after a hiatus of a few years. I haven't bought many folders since coming back, but I've really liked the fixed blades.

As long as I can still get in the door at my old work, I'll keep providing test results. They don't seem to mind me coming back, so that should be for quite some time.

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:46 am

Great find, and first post updated! :spyder: Thanks so much for finding that one!

John
jabba359 wrote:Thanks for putting this together. I used it to update some of the Spydiewiki data that I hadn't found yet. Sal posted his Rc test findings for MT08:

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:32 pm

Updated with preliminary information from Sal on the Elmax MT-13.
Sal Glesser wrote:Hi Dan. I believe we're running 59/60. I'll check for sure on Monay.

sal
Sal Glesser wrote:Hi Dan,

The one I checked was 58.2.

sal

SpydieZ
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 9:04 pm

Postby SpydieZ » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:28 pm

Why is the rockwell so low on s90v? I thought it was the cats meow

gjmsmith00@@yahoo.com
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:20 pm

Postby gjmsmith00@@yahoo.com » Thu May 17, 2012 9:04 pm

could you get the elmax re heat treated to say 61 HRc instead of 58.2 HRc it is said to be LOVE THE KNIFE.just expected at least 60-61HRc

User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 4863
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Postby Ankerson » Fri May 25, 2012 1:31 pm

Updated info in the MT-13 Elmax Mule Team - February 2012

I have one here that is 58.5 ave HRC.

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Fri May 25, 2012 5:32 pm

Ankerson wrote:Updated info in the MT-13 Elmax Mule Team - February 2012

I have one here that is 58.5 ave HRC.
Thanks, Jim!

John

User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 4863
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Postby Ankerson » Sat May 26, 2012 7:37 am

John,

The Super Blue was 61.5 HRC.

Jim

User avatar
bh49
Member
Posts: 11462
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:37 pm
Location: former Constitution state

Postby bh49 » Sat May 26, 2012 12:21 pm

Ankerson wrote:Updated info in the MT-13 Elmax Mule Team - February 2012
I have one here that is 58.5 ave HRC.
Don't you think that is little soft?
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"
George Orwell
My top choices Natives5, Calys, C83 Persian,Hungarian, Memory

User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5046
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Postby JNewell » Sat May 26, 2012 2:39 pm

Thanks, Jim - added.

John
Ankerson wrote:John,

The Super Blue was 61.5 HRC.

Jim


Return to “Spyderco General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], chacho, CXXX, Dazen, Google [Bot], I_like_knives, Monty, Mstach07, Sumdumguy and 54 guests