Radioactive control in knife manufacture

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Wolfie677
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:15 am
Location: South Texas

#41

Post by Wolfie677 »

Blerv wrote:I just hope Spyderco never manufactures knives in South America. I'm terrified of Banana Spiders so the chance of not having one inside my knife is a priority.
:D Any male that knows what the Banana Spider is would be a fool to NOT be terriefied of it. I'm cool with most spiders, they keep my house pest free. Banana Spiders, not so much... :eek:
User avatar
The Mentaculous
Member
Posts: 879
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:21 am
Location: The boonies, NJ

#42

Post by The Mentaculous »

The concern isn't for some kind of Chernobyl incident with hundreds of square miles of radioactive ghost towns, the concern is for people close to the plant and particularly anyone who may be downwind from the plant.

My prayers are with the brave people who are risking their health working around the clock to avert disaster. However, even the worst case scenario in this situation would be nothing like Chernobyl. As I said, the concern is a more localized risk. Chernobyl had NONE of the containment safeguards that are now required, and their reaction was to cover up, rather than seek help and try to mitigate or avert the disaster.


Personally, I'm worrying about people suffering and dying, not worrying about if I can buy knives from there anymore....seems that there are much more meaningful issues for Japan and the World than slight amounts of radioactivity in export materials. Seems a bit insensitive and self-centered to be worried about your own frivolous possessions when the issue is people losing their homes, their family members and their lives.
User avatar
Blerv
Member
Posts: 11833
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:24 am

#43

Post by Blerv »

Nuclear scare has done more bad than good. There are downfalls of all energy resources and most of which are far more toxic or more scarce than nuclear.

Coming up with a "what if?" is easy. There are people who won't fly on airplanes because some crash. Then again, these same people drive cars every day which point-for-point are MULTIPLE times more deadly.

If you don't want to die from natural causes avoid stairs, solid foods, and the sun. Those are more likely to kill you than a freak of mother nature wave and some poorly positioned power structures.
User avatar
MCM
Member
Posts: 3008
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:04 am
Location: Left Field......

#44

Post by MCM »

Agree Pinetree, having worked at one for 27 yrs & have been on the ERO for over 20 yrs.
Got hired during a TMI upgrade in 83. Been there ever since.......
:spyder: :eek: :spyder: :eek: :spyder: :eek: :spyder:
More S90v & CF please.......
User avatar
MCM
Member
Posts: 3008
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:04 am
Location: Left Field......

#45

Post by MCM »

Chernobyl incident / No containment structure & graphite cooling.
Apples & oranges.
:spyder: :eek: :spyder: :eek: :spyder: :eek: :spyder:
More S90v & CF please.......
User avatar
psychophipps
Member
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:19 am
Location: Texas, in the RGV

#46

Post by psychophipps »

There is a limit to how much suck you can effectively plan for, in all honesty. This Japan situation took "super-suck" Hugh Jass eathquake and then slapped on a "-duper-pooper-scooper-" tsunami in the middle of it for good measure.

There isn't a single nuclear plant anywhere on the planet that wouldn't have been totally screwed by an equivalent double-whammy like that. PERIOD. :(
yablanowitz
Member
Posts: 6909
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Liberal, Kansas

#47

Post by yablanowitz »

JNewell wrote:I assume that downrange risk correlates directly to how far up in the atmosphere the radioactive material goes? Bomb testing would create a much greater downwind risk than a ground-level release, then? Don't know, just guessing with some logic...
Yep. Above ground bomb testing sends a cloud of radioactive debris clear to the stratosphere. In the incident I'm recalling, I believe it was a 5 megaton bomb or thereabouts, and it took six days for the jet stream to carry the fallout that far. The only way we will see fallout from the reactors in Japan is if someone decides to blow them up to keep them from melting down.

Also, radiation level decreases with the square of the distance from the source. Double the distance, radiation level drops to one fourth what it is at contact range. Get a mile away from an operating nuclear reactor and you can't detect the radiation from it. The real problem is the radioactive material blowing around and bringing the radiation source to you.
I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.
User avatar
Pinetreebbs
Member
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:55 am
Location: SC

#48

Post by Pinetreebbs »

MCM wrote:Agree Pinetree, having worked at one for 27 yrs & have been on the ERO for over 20 yrs.
Got hired during a TMI upgrade in 83. Been there ever since.......
Thank you for your service.
Have you joined Knife Rights yet?
Go to: http://www.KnifeRights.org
Protecting your Right to own and carry the knives YOU choose.
User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

#49

Post by JNewell »

You're being way too logical, and thus missing the point. ;) Nuclear power is one of those 'hot button' issues that just doesn't yield to logic. :(
Pinetreebbs wrote:Thirty years doesn't change the facts or the laws of physics. Nuclear power is still the cleanest alternative for baseline electricity needs.

There may have been one death from TMI, every year pollution from coal fired power plants kills about 10,000 people. We have thousands of acres of coal ash, including radioactive elements that are in coal, spread over thousands of acres of land. It has no half life. You could collect all our used (it still has 90% energy content) and it would fit inside a super WalMart.

The Three Mile Island incident gave us lessons learned:

1) Nuclear accidents can happen, but the consequences are much less than generally imagined.

2) The Three Mile Island accident was very much a part of the regulatory regime in which nuclear power had been developed. It had less to do with the technology.

3) The regimen under which nuclear plants operate today has improved immeasurably. The safety communications among reactor owners, for one, is orders of magnitude better than it was in the 1970s. This is both the result of industry efforts and the rise of merchant energy companies that now own and operate the majority of reactors.

4) In terms of overall environmental impact, nuclear power is undoubtedly the cleanest and safest form of electrical generation we have today. However, the failure to build new nuclear plants and the continuing operation of a few aging reactors creates the possibility that another Three Mile Island-type accident could occur.
User avatar
Shenmue728
Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:56 pm
Location: Sac County, CA

I can help

#50

Post by Shenmue728 »

Next time anyone wants a seki knife he can buy it from me to ensure it is not radioactive. You must understand the dangers involved, however, and the hazardous material handling fees that go along with them. It's not a safe job, believe me, but I am willing to help out in these dangerous uncertain times.
[CENTER]:spyder::spyder:Spyderco C.O.T.C.O.:spyder::spyder:[/CENTER]
enduraguy
Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:38 pm

#51

Post by enduraguy »

Live a little. Sheesh. But if so inclined buy one of these:

Image
User avatar
Halfneck
Member
Posts: 2001
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Calhoun, Georgia.

#52

Post by Halfneck »

Got injected with some radioactive isotopes on Monday for a Nuclear Bone Scan so I'm still a bit radioactive myself.
"A Delica is still a better weapon than a keyboard and a sour attitude..." Michael Janich
User avatar
chuck_roxas45
Member
Posts: 8776
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
Location: Small City, Philippines

#53

Post by chuck_roxas45 »

GITD endura for me.
User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 6931
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

#54

Post by Ankerson »

yablanowitz wrote:Sorry bud, not true. We got measureable radioactive fallout from above ground bomb testing in China when I was at prototype training in New England back in 1978. It wasn't enough to be harmful, but it was three times normal background count.

A radiography source (the type of source that article was talking about) being melted down would be equivalent to gathering up all the radioactive material released in Japan since the earthquake and concentrating it all into the blade of one Ladybug. Radiography sources use isotopes with half-life measurements in years (Cobalt 60 is commonly used, half-life 5.26 years), fission products typically have half-life measurements in days at most (many are measured in minutes), so even if the steel did somehow get contaminated, the activity would decay away long before the steel got made into a knife, much less got into your hands.

That's what I ment really, I do know that it does go up into the Atmosphere and gets very thin and spread out over a very large area. I didn't want to get too deep into it and start talking about it in that way.

It would take one heck of a lot more than that to hit dangerous levels....

I was an N.B.C. specialist when I was in the Military.
User avatar
Sequimite
Member
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:19 am
Location: Sequim (skwim), WA

#55

Post by Sequimite »

Radiation like so many things today is incorrectly perceived in black and white terms.

The benign brain tumor I had could be treated by surgery or radiation. I chose radiation and have approximately 1 chance in 100 of developing brain cancer. With surgery I would have had about 1 chance in 80 of dying on the operating table. Seemed like an easy choice to me but i can't believe how many choose surgery because radiation and cancer are so scary.
Our reason is quite satisfied, in 999 cases out of every 1000 of us, if we can find a few arguments that will do to recite in case our credulity is criticized by someone else. Our faith is faith in someone else's faith, and in the greatest matters this is most the case.
- William James, from The Will to Believe, a guest lecture at Yale University in 1897
npueppke
Member
Posts: 775
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:28 pm

#56

Post by npueppke »

Oh jeez... why aren't we talking about peanut butter yet?
User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 6931
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

#57

Post by Ankerson »

npueppke wrote:Oh jeez... why aren't we talking about peanut butter yet?
What's happening over in Japan is serious stuff for those who are living there and could be a real threat if things get out of control.

This stuff is no joke for those who are any place near it.

I really feel for the people over in Japan, the stress level of living there now has to be extremely high.
kawr
Member
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 1:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

#58

Post by kawr »

Ankerson wrote:What's happening over in Japan is serious stuff for those who are living there and could be a real threat if things get out of control.

This stuff is no joke for those who are any place near it.

I really feel for the people over in Japan, the stress level of living there now has to extremely high.
Agreed. I honestly thought this was a terrible attempt at trolling and I really hope it is because otherwise this is just too pathetic. How can someone possibly be worried about radioactive knives when there are thousands of bodies washing up on shore and millions of people having to deal with radioactivity.
User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 6931
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

#59

Post by Ankerson »

kawr wrote:Agreed. I honestly thought this was a terrible attempt at trolling and I really hope it is because otherwise this is just too pathetic. How can someone possibly be worried about radioactive knives when there are thousands of bodies washing up on shore and millions of people having to deal with radioactivity.

I know what you mean.

The conditions over there are just horrible and added to that the threat from the radiation... :eek:
User avatar
v8r
Member
Posts: 1936
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Van, Texas,USA,Earth

#60

Post by v8r »

I have tritium sights on my handgun do you think I will be alright.......I guess if the radiation gets to me bad enough I could always just shoot myself with it.

All kidding aside, Japan and it's people have more important things to worry about than a stupid consumer product for the United States.
V8R



Opinions are like belly buttons most people have one:p
Post Reply