Why cage the ball?
Why cage the ball?
I've got a Dodo and D'Allara from a while ago, and I just saw that some of the ball-bearing locks now have a plastic cage around them. Howcome? Does it add anything structurally?
-
- Member
- Posts: 6909
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
The size of the ball bearing was reduced to reduce the overall width of the knife when closed - one of the predominant complaints on the D'Allara. When the ball was made smaller, the cage was added because you could no longer get a hold of it to unlock the knife.Shmackey wrote:I've got a Dodo and D'Allara from a while ago, and I just saw that some of the ball-bearing locks now have a plastic cage around them. Howcome? Does it add anything structurally?
I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.
- The Deacon
- Member
- Posts: 25717
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: Upstate SC, USA
- Contact:
Think the main reason was that knives with an uncaged ball are difficult to unlock with gloved, cold, wet, or otherwise "tactile sensitivity challenged" fingers.
The opposite question would be, why not? In terms of sales, none of the models with uncaged ball locks have been barn-burners. At the very least, now that the caged ball is being used on something more "mainstream" than the P'kal, it offers Spyderco the opportunity to see which configuration sells best.
The opposite question would be, why not? In terms of sales, none of the models with uncaged ball locks have been barn-burners. At the very least, now that the caged ball is being used on something more "mainstream" than the P'kal, it offers Spyderco the opportunity to see which configuration sells best.
Paul
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
My Personal Website ---- Beginners Guide to Spyderco Collecting ---- Spydiewiki
Deplorable :p
WTC # 1458 - 1504 - 1508 - Never Forget, Never Forgive!
That makes sense. I tried a Manix2 and was unable to release the lock with one hand like I could with my D'allara. I only tried one though, it could have just been that one. It was sufficiently difficult that I didn't buy the Manix2 and got an FFG Endura instead.The Deacon wrote:Think the main reason was that knives with an uncaged ball are difficult to unlock with gloved, cold, wet, or otherwise "tactile sensitivity challenged" fingers.
- defenestrate
- Member
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
- Location: RTP NC area
- Contact:
As I have mentioned previously, the plastic cage is NOT a load-bearing structure.. Though it could stand up to some force, it is designed to add grippiness and to guide the action of the BBL, in fact kind of isolating the load of the action of the lock itself from the loads placed on the frame of the knife through whatever use they come by... Did I word that right? I hope so.. in any case, the polymer cage for the BBL performs admirably at its job as far as i can tell and the fact that it is not all steel does not bother me one bit. I like both caged and uncaged BBLs just fine - the former, more for general EDC functionality and use and the latter, for its aesthetic appeal.
-
Happy, Happy, Happy! Peel, Peel, Peel!
Happy, Happy, Happy! Peel, Peel, Peel!
I've put my manix 2 through some **** and it's also seen it's share of harsh solvents. The polymer is holding up fine. I can close it with just one thumb but i usually use my thumb and forefinger. Never used the bbl yet. I'll get a phoenix eventually though but i think it'll be more difficult to close under certain circumstances. I don't mind the CBBL at all though. Never had any issues with all the use of accidentally closing it or actuating the lock unintentionally.
The two reasons I can think of: (1) difficult to unlock = good* and (2) it just adds another piece to the otherwise nicely simple engineering equation. Bonus reason: (3) it doesn't look as nice.The Deacon wrote:Think the main reason was that knives with an uncaged ball are difficult to unlock with gloved, cold, wet, or otherwise "tactile sensitivity challenged" fingers.
The opposite question would be, why not?
*I always thought it was cool that an errant finger touching the ball on one side would just roll off.
I think the main reason the spring is easier to depress on the D'Allara and some other models is spring tension. I can depress it with my pinky yet the manix2 takes a serious yank from both fingers. I'm sure it could have been engineered either way but it does seem more bank-vault-like.
The CBBL seems thinner, more tactical looking, and less likely to have junk get into the lock assembly. While I like the tactile feel of the uncaged ball, the version 2.0 makes more sense.
The CBBL seems thinner, more tactical looking, and less likely to have junk get into the lock assembly. While I like the tactile feel of the uncaged ball, the version 2.0 makes more sense.
aesthetics have alot to do with knives for the consumer. I can't imagine a Phoenix or a Dodo with a CBBL. It would just ruin the lines but i can't imagine a Manix 2 with a BBL either. I actually like the two tone look with the clear polymer as it offsets it from the knife. Now if the manix came in a Black bladed version with black clip and black liners. Then i would take a black polymer cage as well. Yes i want the liners to be black too and the laynard tube ohh and the hardware. i geuss it's how you first see something too because then you get used to how that looks. I'm sure people who were with spyderco from the start feel this way everytime a new version of a spydie classic comes out.
- chuck_roxas45
- Member
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:43 pm
- Location: Small City, Philippines
what about a cage in metal? I would definitely be digging this.
http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2014/ ... ot-gif.gif" target="_blank
-
- Member
- Posts: 6909
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Liberal, Kansas
The Dodo is thin because the Ball lock does not require liners. It is, however, quite wide in the closed position. Compare the lockback Mini-Manix (which isn't exactly petite) with the ball lock D'Allara.Shmackey wrote:Interesting. The Dodo seems very thin to me.
I think you can see the D'Allara is quite wide, which uses up pocket space faster than thickness does (and it doesn't lack that, either).
Now look at the Manix 2 next to that same Mini-Manix.
The ball lock forces the pivot pin off-center. The larger the ball, the farther off-center the pivot has to be to accomodate it. The farther off-center the pivot is, the wider the knife will be when closed. Smaller ball means narrower closed profile and harder to get a hold of, hence the cage.
I don't believe in safe queens, only in pre-need replacements.