In Defense of Liners

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
User avatar
Bloke
Member
Posts: 5425
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 12:43 am
Location: Sydney, Australia.

Re: In Defense of Liners

#21

Post by Bloke »

Harkwit wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:57 am
I might be in the minority opinion here, but am I the only one who doesn't get excited when Spyderco announces a 'linerless' model? The centering woes of the Para 3 LW, and the poor action in every Native 5 LW I've handled just gives me pause for concern, particularly towards the latest Stretch XL. ...
There's no such thing as a Light Weight Model (LW).

Light weight models of the original knife are the Budget Version and accordingly you get what you paid for. :smiling-cheeks
A day without laughter is a day wasted. ~ Charlie Chaplin
User avatar
VooDooChild
Member
Posts: 2617
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:29 am

Re: In Defense of Liners

#22

Post by VooDooChild »

Soanso McMasters wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:21 pm
The only knives that should be linerless are Salt knives. I love the look and feel of knives with liners, particularly full liners.
Same.
I want my salts linerless, but I would like them on all of my non-salty knives.
"Rome's greatest contribution to mathematics was the killing of Archimedes."
skeeg11
Member
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 11:45 pm

Re: In Defense of Liners

#23

Post by skeeg11 »

I think the middle ground here is something like a linerless G10 w/phophorbronze washers. Sorta like a Siren.
James Y
Member
Posts: 8057
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Southern CA

Re: In Defense of Liners

#24

Post by James Y »

Personally, I'd love to see some Golden-made, linerless G10, back lock Salt models.

Jim
User avatar
brancron
Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:12 pm

Re: In Defense of Liners

#25

Post by brancron »

I generally value light weight over “good action.” And there’s no real world use case in which the added strength (which is likely marginal anyways) of liners would make a difference to me. The Manix 2 LW, Native Chief and Stretch 2 XL are so good (in my opinion) partly because of how light they are for the size.
DukeBrnz
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue May 14, 2019 11:27 am

Re: In Defense of Liners

#26

Post by DukeBrnz »

Sharp Guy wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 1:23 pm
I like the models with liners but I also like and appreciate the models without liners.

Poor action on the Native 5 LWs? I have at least 6 N5 LWs and I think they're all great considering no liners or bronze washers. They're all reasonably smooth and when open I can push the lock bar and the blade drops 90°and allows me to close it the rest of the way with my thumb. My linerless G10 N5 is nice too. I still have 1 N5 with liners and it's developed a weird click when I open and close it. I still haven't figured out why it's doing that
Hey I think I know what's going on with your G10 Native! I believe it's the spring, rubbing against the lockbar and catching slightly. Try putting a dab of lube on the lockbar where the spring rubs. I use florinated grease but I imagine something else similarly thick could work. Good luck, and let me know if it works.
User avatar
Blerv
Member
Posts: 11833
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:24 am

Re: In Defense of Liners

#27

Post by Blerv »

I adore linerless knives. Lightweight and cheap.
Drilled liners annoy me, more money and collectors of lint.

In general though 95% of my collection sits in a Spyderpack or near it. I beat up the cheap ones more than the rest.

Plus a liner-free FRN knife is basically built on nylon washers. They are smooth as glass most the time. Maybe not “quick” for the nails-flickers but smoooooth.
User avatar
RustyIron
Member
Posts: 2398
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: La Habra, CA
Contact:

Re: In Defense of Liners

#28

Post by RustyIron »


Off the top of my head, I have four different linerless models: Manix 2 LW, Native 5 LW, Dragonfly, and Ladybug. The two latter models shouldn't be part of the discussion because the one-piece molded construction is what makes them what they are. But the Lightweight Manix and Native 5 are also great. I actually had the Heavyweight versions of each knife, and sold them because I preferred the lightweight. They function as I expect, they're light, and I marvel at the brilliant simplification of the design. Please don't go buggering up the elegant linerless models with superfluous slabs of metal and unnecessary bits and bolts.

User avatar
Blerv
Member
Posts: 11833
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:24 am

Re: In Defense of Liners

#29

Post by Blerv »

The Manix2 LW is interesting. The cage and the ribbed FRP are definitely an evolution of the design over slab lockbacks of year past. Colin Chapman would be proud.
User avatar
u.w.
Member
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:25 am
Location: VABch

Re: In Defense of Liners

#30

Post by u.w. »

My preference is for Liner-LESS.

u.w.
User avatar
Doc Dan
Member
Posts: 14815
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:25 am
Location: In a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity.

Re: In Defense of Liners

#31

Post by Doc Dan »

I want liners in some and linerless in others. I prefer my Delica and Endura and SSS and Caly3 with liners. Others I prefer linerless.

As far as linerless goes, the M2 LW seems quite amazing to me (so, too, does the M2 linerless G10 backlock, which I hope comes back).
I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under This Roof! (John Adams regarding the White House)

Follow the Christ, the King,
Live pure, speak true, right wrong, follow the King--
Else, wherefore born?" (Tennyson)



NRA Life Member
Spydernation 0050
User avatar
apollo
Member
Posts: 2901
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: A place where idiots and corrupt people are called the government…

Re: In Defense of Liners

#32

Post by apollo »

Before anything I use (abuse) the manix 2 LW (more over that later).
It is a great knife and everything i say is my personal opinion so i am not trying to offend anyone here.

But the LW is and will forever be a thorn in my eye and a nail in my coffin.
Why ? Because not only do i find the weight of the Manix 2 g10 perfect it also makes the knife one of the strongest folders spyderco makes and on top of that it makes it also one of the more customizable knives spyderco makes.( And i just love doing that ) Now the LW on the other hand is far to light for me , that it not only makes it feel more unreliable and weaker then the g10 for me it also makes it feel cheap (And that is not the case money wise) on top of that it is not customizable even better take it apart and you can trow half of it in the trash. And no giving it a paint job still leaves the frcp handle shape that i find very grippy but definitely not appealing.

On the positive side it is a very good knife so since i can not stand it i use it as disposable knife I generally do not care about. So I probably used it more and harder then most who have a version of it. That is why i hate it and love it at the same time. Its a great knife but i fear i hate it because i fear spyderco will some day stop making g10 knives with liners as the Manix 2 g10 out of pure cost. And that will break my heart a bit. I will always gladly pay extra for a linerd g10 knife and definitely for a Manix with that setup. Why do i think that ? I could be a fool. But Lw knives are trending more and more and people bash on everything that is a little heavier these days. On top of that cost of manufacturing will only go up so it worry’s me allot.

And about that linerles Manix Lockback oh please spyderco please put some liners in that thing so we can have the OG back. The Old mini manix is my favorite EDC of all time i have bin using it almost daily for more then 5 years now and it still cuts like a lazer is as strong as bulldozer and the thing keeps on looking new whatever i do with it it does not even scratch! While if i even look at some newer spyders i can swear i can see them scratching or pitting or chipping somewhere even without touching them. The only thing bad i could ever say about the originals is that the paint on the clip sucks so bad it feels like it came from a flea market. But take off the clip and that knife is pure gold!

So HURRAY for Liners and yikes for LW’s :squinting-tongue
User avatar
Evil D
Member
Posts: 27147
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:48 pm
Location: Northern KY

Re: In Defense of Liners

#33

Post by Evil D »

James Y wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:32 pm
Personally, I'd love to see some Golden-made, linerless G10, back lock Salt models.

Jim


I really like linerless G10 because it gives me a lot of freedom to tweak the handle shape if I need to. G10 can also be much more rigid than FRN in a given thickness. I really expected to see this more once they started using clip screw anchors, since liners used to be a big part of clip mounting but they don't seem as necessary for that anymore. I have a couple old linerless micarta models where the clip screws thread right into the micarta and I won't touch the screws out of fear of ripping out the threads.
All SE all the time since 2017
~David
dlum1
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 9:15 am

Re: In Defense of Liners

#34

Post by dlum1 »

The linerless g10 golden models are currently my favorite -- just as rigid as frn with liners but without the maintenance hassle. However, the g10 is not as durable as FRN or FRCP. Still, I'd love to own a g10 native salt or a g10 native chief salt (or both ;) )
User avatar
JSumm
Member
Posts: 5758
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:59 pm
Location: North of Atlanta, GA USA

Re: In Defense of Liners

#35

Post by JSumm »

I'm really enjoying the linerless construction of the Native Chief. Keeps the weight down. Rigid enough to not tell a difference. And the smooth surface on the inside is easier to clean out. Kinda best of both worlds.
- Jeff
May your feet be warm and dry and your throat warm with whiskey. A knife in hand or in the sock band.
MNOSD Member #0005
cjk
Member
Posts: 1055
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: In Defense of Liners

#36

Post by cjk »

I prefer both. I wouldn't want either one to go away.
The salt knives are superb for wet and salty things exactly the way they are.
I like the aftermarket support for scales and such for many of the linered models.
Spyderco makes a shocking number of both. It's pretty impressive to see the whole product line in several cabinets like at blade show. They have a ton of different SKUs.
James Y
Member
Posts: 8057
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Southern CA

Re: In Defense of Liners

#37

Post by James Y »

Evil D wrote:
Wed Jun 29, 2022 2:01 am
James Y wrote:
Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:32 pm
Personally, I'd love to see some Golden-made, linerless G10, back lock Salt models.

Jim


I really like linerless G10 because it gives me a lot of freedom to tweak the handle shape if I need to. G10 can also be much more rigid than FRN in a given thickness. I really expected to see this more once they started using clip screw anchors, since liners used to be a big part of clip mounting but they don't seem as necessary for that anymore. I have a couple old linerless micarta models where the clip screws thread right into the micarta and I won't touch the screws out of fear of ripping out the threads.

Yes, knife handle designs have come a long way since screws threaded directly into the handle materials.

I also think that even though FRN may be tougher than G10, G10 is still plenty tough. I've used SAKS with cellidor handles for decades, and at worst have hairline cracked them a little. G10 is WAY more durable than cellidor, delrin, wood, as well as many other materials used in knife handles.

Jim
User avatar
araneae
Member
Posts: 5491
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: A lil more south of the Erie shore, Ohio

Re: In Defense of Liners

#38

Post by araneae »

Carry a Salt 1 for a few months and then tell me about the action. I have a pile of Salt series knives and they are all super smooth. I drop them in the the dirt, cut muddy vegetation, stick them back in my pocket and if needed, take them in the shower for a rinse at the end of the day. No drying required. Do that with a linered knife and we'll compare in a month. I have lots of knives with liners, but linerless has its place for sure.

As I have said many times before, I have seen only 1 linerless FRN handle broken in my time on this forum and it was run over by a Bobcat while the blade was stuck in the ground. Perceived strength of liners is just that.
So many knives, so few pockets... :)
-Nick

Last in: N5 Magnacut
The "Spirit" of the design does not come through unless used. -Sal
ABX2011
Member
Posts: 2300
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 7:54 pm

Re: In Defense of Liners

#39

Post by ABX2011 »

How does Stretch XL lockup compare to other Spydies?
I love the Manix 2 Lightweight. Also like the Dragonfly 2 wharnie. Never warmed to the Native 5 Lightweight or the Para 3 Lightweight.
User avatar
FRNFanboy
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 8:57 am

Re: In Defense of Liners

#40

Post by FRNFanboy »

I’m with you in favor of liners. Even if linerless FRN is perfectly adequate, steel liners are necessarily more sturdy and rigid. But for me, the real difference is in the feel. Linerless knives feel cheap and flimsy, even if they aren’t. I’ve gotten used to it more or less in the Native 5 Lightweight, but the Manix 2 and Para 3 just feel unpleasant. Even a small knife like the Delica feels more solid and substantial.

With that in mind, I’ve been curious why Spyderco uses the “milled out” design in these knives, maximizing the amount of air inside the handle. Making the scales just solid slabs of FRN with no gaps or spaces would make them more rigid and substantial in the hand. Do we need to make a lightweight knife that much lighter?
Post Reply