Postby Michael Janich » Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:21 am
Hey, All:
Great comments and questions. Thank you for the continued discussion. Let me try to respond to everything in one shot...
To Wartstein, yes, many of my older videos featured an Endura Trainer; however, that was largely due to the fact that it was the best option available at the time. Even after the Yojimbo 2 live blade was released, I continued to use an Endura Trainer because the Yo 2 Trainer didn't follow for almost six years.
Yes, a lock back can be made to MBC standards (to withstand 200 inch-pounds of pressure per inch of blade length). The Chinook was one of the earliest to prove that. However, with that strength comes a much more "deliberate" action and typically a concentric tang profile on the blade. For my preferences, this makes high-speed deployment more challenging.
To Accutron, yes, the Native Chief has a great back lock. Historically, that knife was designed way back when the Native first came out. However, it was not produced until a few years ago. Why? Because the longer blade produced greater leverage and needed a sturdier back lock. The refinements made to the Native 5 back lock engineering achieved that and paved the way for the Chief. The longer blade on the Chief provides more mass and is easier to deploy than the Native 5. It also makes it 0.6 inches too long to be Colorado legal, so for my purposes, it's not a good choice.
The back lock action on the Endura and Delica is different than the Native and Native Chief, so they lend themselves to faster opening. Their Trademark Round Holes are also positioned higher than the Native and Native Chief, providing more leverage and allowing a more linear drive of the thumb during thumb openings. Same mechanism, but tangibly different expressions of it...
I, too, have worn out locks on Endura Trainers; however, I don't think the issue lies mainly with the lock geometry. I personally think it's the low-carbon AUS-6 blades not being as resilient as the more capable blade steels used on the live blades.
Back to Wartstein, yes, FRN handles on a back lock don't have any issues with lateral force, since all the spring tension is applied in the plane of the blade.
And, Xformer, I agree with you to a point. I feel that corrosion resistance is a true benefit in a self-defense folder, especially for those who carry in the waistband and/or live in humid climates. When I designed the Ronin 2 (granted, not a folder, but intended for self-defense), Eric asked me about my choice of steel. I chose CTS BD1 because it was corrosion resistant and would keep the price of the knife affordable. The criminal on the other end of it would never know the difference if it had to be used for its primary intended purpose. With all that said, I don't necessarily feel a true Salt-worthy build is necessary for a personal-defense knife. Good stainless steels do their jobs well enough for my personal tastes. If ultra corrosion resistance is important due to your environment, I'd opt for a Pacific Salt 2 and an Endura Trainer. I understand and respect your opinion, though...
I hope this helps...
Stay safe,
Mike