eventhorizon wrote: ↑Thu Jun 17, 2021 5:49 am
I think the problem here is expectations on the one hand (first Spyderco) and experience on the other (Spyderco fans).
When you are not what we consider a "knife guy" (which in most cases means you're kind of a steel nerd and a knife collector to a certain extent), but you want to purchase a knife as a reliable user and you spend a considerable amount of money (3-figure MRSP) because you keep hearing about that Spyderco quality and then what you get is a knife that feels plasticy, isn't sharp and keeps coming loose, and then Spyderco fans tell you well of course you need to
fix the looseness with Locktite and of course
you need to sharpen it and of course it's
very strong plastic, then I would just feel punked... I mean,
seriously?
When you buy a knife (or any product for that matter) of a company that is praised for its quality, you do not want to have to sharpen it to be sharp... you don't not want to have to fix defects when you take the product out of the box
at all.
When I started to get into Spyderco knives, I was disappointed every single time I bought one because every single time it wasn't as sharp as expected, not as centered as expected, not as high-value feeling as expected.
But I grew into that whole knife tinkerer thing because every single time I loved the design and every single time I sensed the well-thought-out functionality of the knife.
So I guess we as "knife people", as "Spyderco fans" even, have come to accept that we have to tinker our knives to make them what we expect, because usually they don't come perfect out of the box, and with experience we adapted our expectations. Spyderco provides a strong basis and with just a little DIY tweaking, you can get where your personal nigh perfect knife is sitting.
I'm a guitar guy and it's similar with all my Gibson guitars... they never come perfect, you always have to tinker, sometimes a lot, but when done right, they can be almost perfect.
Dude thank you for backing me up! I'm pretty surprised by all the " you should have known that you'd have to put some loctite on it and file down the unfinished edges" responses.
I do appreciate the design and well thought out functionality.
The hole being sharp was not a deal breaker for me, I just expected it to not be so sharp that it would rip at callouses. I agree that I can just hit it with a ceramic rod, and going forward, I will assume that's part of the deal with spyderco. I've bought several Tojiro kitchen knives and know that they have a sharp back corner, that needs to be filed a bit.
To the person who said FRN is not plastic, I don't know what to say...it's literally in the name. Fiberglass reinforced nylon. It is nylon with fiberglass in it.
I'll admit that you all are right though, that it is the best material for what I want and need in a knife handle, and the grip is actually really good, ergonomics even better. The person I quoted got it- it just didn't feel as high value as I expected. I think having a slightly bigger handle in the salt 2 will help with this.
The only comparison I made to the benchmade was about how sharp it was out of the box. But price wise, I would say this knife is even more expensive, proportionally, to the $275 benchmade. I agree that this knife was likely bought and returned, and not as sharp as a brand new spyderco would be, but are you saying that I shouldn't expect a $106 msrp (even though i paid 75) H1 spyderco to be as sharp, brand new, as a well used benchmade in 154cm? What if it was a $275 spyderco in H1? Or a mini bugout that's 10 years old? Does it matter how much the knife was, if the steel quality is the same or better? Are you saying smaller spydercos within the same series are less sharp because they're more affordable?
I am willing to give spyderco another shot, and yeah, I'll send this one back to spyderco instead of amazon. I'm going to get a salt 2 but I saw a review where a guy points out that the hole is bigger in the leaf shaped blades than in the wharncliffe, and the thumbrest is more vertical/pronounced. Can anyone give me a reason to get one vs the other? And ugh, I am going to go with full serrated H1. I know people want me to do lc200n but corrosion resistance is more important to me. If I love this knife, I promise my next one will be a plain edge salt in lc200n.
I'm even going to buy a sharpmaker, after using whetstones my entire life. So there you go, Spyderpeople!